On 08/06/2012 09:42 PM, Christophe Travert wrote:
Timon Gehr , dans le message (digitalmars.D:174329), a écrit :
On 08/06/2012 07:20 PM, Christophe Travert wrote:

What do you think?

Creating byzantine language rules to cater to unimportant or
non-existent use cases will slaughter the language.

What exactly do you consider byzantine here, whatever that means?

byzantine means involved. Why deliberately make the language more
complicated for no gain whatsoever?

Implicit cast is an already defined feature. Clarifying the way
parenthesis-less function calls exist by adding a casting rule is making
the langage more simple IMHO,

I don't know what to respond to this. Are you serious?

and might improve the current position. Of
course, if your point is that parenthesis-less function calls are
unimportant or non-existent,

It isn't. My point is that there actually is no issue that would
require some complex solution.

then I understand your point of view, but other people seems to think 
differently.


Reply via email to