>What language/s and compiler/s
do you prefer to program sound card-based ham digital >modes or other DSP ham
applications for Windows?
Here (for Multipsk) I use Pascal and I compile with
Delphi 6, but the standard (Mixw...) is to use C or C++ and to compile with
Visual C++ or the Borland C++ compiler. The Visual Basic is also very used but
not so much as C++ (as far as I know).
C++ is much more for the true
programmers (the ones who like to program in Object, to
manipulate pointers and so on). Pascal is much more for the ones who
want to program in a simple language, and who want to keep on ignoring
all these subtilities (although you can program objects and use pointers if
really you like this...). Basic is close to Pascal.
73
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:59
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] No PAX(2) in
MultiPSK 3.9!?
Hello to Patrick, the author of
MultiPSK
Now you made it very clear
that this 3.9 is not a simple real number and
that software version designators in general are elements of a "n" fold
dimensional space. The size of this "n" can change from software to software.
For example, in a certain kind of software, one dimension could be
the language used, other the class of user like home, education, government,
etc. Another dimension could be the age group of the user, and so
on.
73 de Germano in GG76BT
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:27
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] No PAX(2)
in MultiPSK 3.9!?
Hello Germano,
"3.9" does not pertain to the real numbers
set!
Simply to a double dimension set: one
dimension for the "version" (3) and one dimension for the sub-version (9).
Sometimes I add a third dimension for the sub-sub-version.
73
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 5:39
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] No PAX(2)
in MultiPSK 3.9!?
Alan,
you are right about decimal numbers. However the various usages for
designating different versions of a software are more complex. Notice
that very often the have more than one separator dot/point.
Example: MS Internet Explorer Version
6.0.2900.2180 ..........
By the way, could version 3.9
mean 3 and nine tenths?
73 de Germano, PU2NTC.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:31
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] No
PAX(2) in MultiPSK 3.9!?
I know that now, but I am used to decimal numbers
where 3.9 > 3.13.
Perhaps he should number his revisions of ver.
4 (whenever it may
appear) starting with 4.01 rather than
4.1.
73
Alan NV8A
On 03/17/06 03:38 am Özhan
Önder wrote:
> Dear Alan,
> Version 3.9 > Version
3.10 > Version 3.11 > Version 3.12 > Version 3.13 and
next time Dear Patrick will issue Version 3.14..
>
Understand..
> 73 Özhan TA3BQ
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
