What does IM mean?  Remember some of us dont know (or dont remember) all
these initials being thrown at us.  HSMM (whatever that means) sounds like
an intereting concept, but it sounds to me like it is working a repeater, or
a sattelite.  You are not REALLY communicating with the middle man, but thru
it.  The transmitter you are hearing is NOT located at the location of the
person whose call you are working - thru not valid for DXCC.  You are
talking from your country - to whomever has this access point - thus both of
you are just working a remote transmitter from what I gather here.  Again-
not valid for DXCC.  Not valid for WAS , etc.   Now just for chatting , that
is OK, but we can do that on computer links so I really dont see the
advantage, except if one is not where he/she can reach an internet provider.

  For groups who just want to chat, it sounds like an good procedure, or
possibly for emergency nets - now that would seem an excellent way to pass
information between search units, fire and police, etc, when other
communications is down.  Much like sticking up an emergency repeater, but
allowing many to talk at one time.  I am not sure that HF would be the place
for it, since the ever changing propagaton would complicate connections, and
would assume 6 meters (with some power available) or 220 or 2 meters would
be the place.  Of course that shortens the distance each network group would
be able to communicate, and you would have to have more of these access
point.  And how do they communicate with each other?


Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each.
moderator  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] 3kHz or 500Hz Re: Updates on effect of FCC R&O


> Using HSMM networked radio techniques many operators can have separate,
> individual, IM exchanges keyboard-to-keyboard on the same frequency, at
the
> same time.
>
> This is similar to trunked digital repeaters in which many individuals can
> have separate DV QSOs on the same frequency pair at the same time.
>
> So when you transmit on this 10kHz wide HF channel, from your perspective
> you are in a clear one-to-one QSO with another Ham, sort of like using PSK
> without the QRM, except that your message is buffered and then transmitted
> all at once in very short and fast burst. Thus my anology to IM.
>
> However, you are actully transmitting to a HSMM radio access point (AP)
> along with hundreds of other Hams at the same time and on the same 10 kHz
> channel.  So, for example, if you have a beam, all stations would point to
> the HF AP instead of at each other.  If you are using a non-directional
> antenna, then you would simply look for an AP in the area of the world you
> wish to work.
> Simple.
>
>
> >From: "jgorman01" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: [digitalradio] 3kHz or 500Hz Re: Updates on effect of FCC R&O
> >Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:14:14 -0000
> >
> >You need to explain this further.  Just making the statement that IM
> >is a better analogy just doesn't provide any information as to how it
> >applies to sharing of RF frequencies, at least not to me.  You might
> >help me out by elucidating a little on just what shared resource with
> >IM is applicable to HF data transmission.
> >
> >Jim
> >WA0LYK
> >
> >--- In [email protected], "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > IM would be a better analogy than a party line.
> > >
> > > John - K8OCL
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
>
> Other areas of interest:
>
> The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
> DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy
discussion)
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.11/493 - Release Date:
10/23/2006
>
>



Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to