Should we consider trying to establish calling or beacon frequencies 
for the non-PSK31, non-RTTY, non-ALE, digital modes?  I'm thinking 
along these lines because I'm having to dial between 14072 and 14110 
on 20M for those few opportinties to catch MT63, Olivia, MFSK16, 
Hell, PSK63, PAX2, DominoEx, Throb, Chip64,  etc, etc.  40M is a 
similar "chore".  If I park on ,say, 14075 ...with a wide filter I 
can hear some of the folks that start up but often miss the guys that 
are riding high on 14108.5

I wondering if we could informally establish a calling frequency for 
MT63, Olivia, MFSK16, Hell, PSK63, PAX2, DominoEx, Throb, where we 
all agree to less than 20 second CQ calls and  60 seconds taken to 
coordinate a move to a free frequency. Ideally I would love to have 
an APRS-type beacon system where we can see who is on frequency via 
our maps,  and then move people off the freq to arrange QSO's , all 
control operated not unattended beacons.  My recent 300 baud packet 
tests and PAX2 tests suggest that these two modes are not robust 
enough fo weak signal detecting.  Olivia would be idea but is slow 
for beacon-type work. I guess we could establish it so that any 
digital (data)  mode could be used to "beacon" with, but perhaps 
encourage nothing more than 500 Hz wide signal .  I would probably 
beacon with 16/500 Olivia. 

Any thoughts on this?  What would be a good 20 , 40, and 80M 
frequency?  We would need one that all IARU regions could use, one 
that most ham license classess can access, one that is not common for 
others to CQ on. One that does not have a lot of automated PACTOR 
traffic, and ideally one that is outside the usual RTTY contest 
range . Suggestions ?

How about 14073, 7073, and 3573? These would be the radio dial 
frequency , all USB,  AF frequency standard would be 1000 Hz.

Would they work for most parts of the world? "73" would be easy to 
remember!  
Of course, we would refrain from beaconing if the frequency is in use.


Andy K3UK.




Reply via email to