> Paul L Schmidt, K9PS wrote: > Yep. I was thinking of the 80 meter one. At 130 feet or so per side, > it's pretty big, but still fits in some lots where there's not enough > length to do a 160 dipole. I really should restrict things that require > thinking to before 5:00 PM when I switch the brain in standby after work...
Did you mean to type "At 65 feet or so per side ..." when you referred to a full wave 80M loop rather than "At 130 feet or so per side ..."? Just wondering as it confused me for a moment. :-) -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... Hope yours was a blessed CHRISTmas and that you will have a joy-filled New Year! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ URL: bibleseven (dot) com
