I have been lobbying the WinLink team to do this for years, without
success. You are more than welcome to try, Jose.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In [email protected], "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Dave Bernstein wrote:
>
> > As is often the case in engineering, Jose, perfect is the enemy
of
> > good. What Rick KN6KB discovered while developing SCAMP's busy
> > detector was that he could detect CW, PSK, Pactor, and SSB at an
~80%
> > confidence level without enormous difficulty. SCAMP beta testers
were
> > amazed by the effectiveness of this first iteration.
> >
> > Pushing the confidence level from 80% to 100%, however, would
take
> > years -- if its even possible. But a busy detector that works 80%
of
> > the time would cut QRM from unattended automated stations (like
> > WinLink PMBOs) by a factor of 5!
> >
> > Your comment that "many think it is simpler than it really is to
do
> > it WELL" is frankly moot; Rick demonstrated two years ago that
useful
> > busy frequency detection was implementable on a PC and soundcard.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Dave, AA6YQ
>
> I understand that 80% is fairly good. Hope the long standing
> anti-automatic stations lobby sees it as acceptable as well.
>
> What is seemingly left, then, is to simply push the busy detector
into
> practice and 24/7 service.
>
> Who will get the task done?
>
> 73, Jose
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
>
> V Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía
y Educación Energética.
> 22 al 25 de mayo de 2007
> Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
> http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier
>
