well, you know what two cents will buy these days, Kurt!  (HI)

----Original Message Follows----
From: "wa8vbx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:13:39 -0400

So if encryption is allowed/use on Ham Radio who is going to control the 
crpyto gear, and who is going to set the daily keys? Who says station K1XXX 
can have a setup up but K1XXZ can't, even though both are working encomm's. 
So of the reasons you give might be valid, but it is would be opening up 
another can of worms, just like the deal with the Red Cross is with their 
background checks.
I say HR does not need encryption, and no it would not provide seamless 
capability.

My 2 cents
Kurt
K8YZK
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: expeditionradio
   To: [email protected]
   Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 12:07 AM
   Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption


   > Bill N9DSJ wrote:
   > Can see no valid reason for encryption on our frequencies. If one
   > could provide an single example I would be interested......

   Hi Bill,

   Hams should certainly have the capability to pass over-the-air
   encrypted traffic or scrambled speech for emergencies and disaster
   relief. There are other situations where it would be useful, too. In
   order to have seamless capability in an emergency, hams should be
   familiar and proficient with the use of it on a regular basis.

   Encryption should not be with the sole intent to obscure the content
   from other hams, but it should be availble to hams when there is a
   need to shield sensitive data and information from evil-doers.

   Here are a few reasons for hams to use limited encryption in the
   over-the-air communication:

   1. To shield private data
   2. To shield private telephone numbers
   3. To shield sensitive email addresses
   4. To shield system passwords
   5. To shield station remote control
   6. To secure access to stations
   7. To control satellites
   8. To shield messages sent by a 3rd party to ham
   9. To protect medical information
   10. To protect 3rd party traffic requiring confidentiality
   11. To control repeaters
   12. To shield identities of children

   I'm sure there are more reasons... but that's some of the things I
   thought of in the few minutes it took to write this.

   Bonnie KQ6XA


Reply via email to