Whether you find an interesting signal by clicking on traces in a panoramic tuning display or by rotating your tranceiver's tuning dial, ideally you should then direct your digital mode application to place the selected signal at a pre-specified optimal audio offset by appropriately QSYing your transceiver.
Though different names are used to describe this function, most digital mode applications have provided it for a long time. 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "G. McFarlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So which is better, park the dial and move the audio > center frequency (ACF) “marker”, or park the marker and move > the frequency dial? The former seems to be the standard method used for > PSK31 (when using programs like Digipan and PSK31), but the latter seems > to make more sense in the context of finding your peak output point in the > bandpass and leave your marker there for best decoding. Is it partially > dependant on the available filters and/or the age of the rig and its > ability to handle digital modes? > > > > > This latter concept seems to fly in the face of guidance > (at least for modes like Olivia) provided on hflink.com and other tutorial > sites where the ACF marker is supposed to be set in accordance with the > tone pair/mode in use and the frequencies are voluntarily set based on the > “sub-band” (.65 or .50, etc). This suggests that both the > frequency and ACF should be fixed or channelized, regardless of rig or > bandpass “sweet spots”. > > > > > From the context of making it easier to find signals and > establish QSO’s, this guidance makes sense, assuring (to some > degree) that if your dial is set to a specific frequency and your ACF > marker is in the proper spot for the tone pair in use, any one who comes > along can find you quickly. If everyone running Olivia between 14104 and > 14109 used “channels” on .50, a tone pair of 1000/32 and a > marker on 1000hz (at least to call CQ) QSOs would be much easier to locate > and lock onto. Between 14072 and 14078, “channels” should be > on .65, running 500/16 with an ACF of 750Hz. Easier, but is it at the > expense of best decoding, power output, and QRM avoidance? > > > > > Again, this is all by gentlemen’s agreement, but > there seems to be little other established guidance in print or on the > web. Was this originally suggested to assist in happily co-existing with > other “channelized” modes frequently found in these sub- bands, > like Pactor? Wouldn’t the “park the marker, move the > dial” method make it difficult to post and follow digital spots on > sites like Andy’s (K3UK) if everyone’s dial showed a different > frequency? (A minor concern, maybe, but certainly a huge help on these > sparse bands!) > > > > > Finally, could this same question be applied > equally to RTTY, where it depends on the software used, despite long > established rules for mark/space frequencies? If I use MixW, I can keep my > rig dial fixed and click on any of several signals in the passband, > decoding them all equally (easy, certainly but not optimal). Is this just > the wrong way to use this software? Should the ACF be locked centered > between the standard RTTY M/S audio frequencies and the dial moved? > Using MMTTY, the marker stays fixed and the dial is adjusted so > it’s not a concern. Is one better than the other, personal > preference, or rig dependent? > > R/ > Glenn KD4ULB > > > Bill Aycock wrote: > > >> Frank- I think that there is MUCH confusion in our ranks on > this > >> subject. For instance, I set my rig to one frequency > (usually > >> 14,070.00) and leave it there. I tune to different > signals by moving > >> the "marker" that shows the > offset from the base frequency on the > >> waterfall. The radio > bandwidth is many times as wide as the signal > >> width (for > PSK31), and many signals can be accommodated in the > >> > passband. I have a tuneable Digital filter, and one of the most > >> educational tricks is to shift the upper and lower audio limits > of > >> the filter, and watch the result on the waterfall One of > the sources > >> of the confusion is the ambiguity in the > meaning of "best". I think > >> that it is highly > improbable that we can get a clear definition. Good > >> luck- > Bill-W4BSG > >> > > > > In my opinion there are > two "classes" of radios for digital use, and > > which > type you have dictates how you handle the center frequency > > > question. Older "legacy" radios do not allow use of narrow > crystal > > filters (originally intended for CW) in the digital > modes. The > > designers of these radios either ignored the digital > modes altogether > > (requiring, for example, interfacing the radio > through the mic > > connector) or simply didn't care much (my > FT-900, an otherwise good > > radio, falls into this category). > These radios can be used for digital, > > but lack the most > important QRM-fighting tools--the crystal and > > mechanical > filters. For these radios you can get away with tuning by > > > leaving the VFO alone and simply "moving the marker" on the > waterfall to > > the signal you wish to receive. But you will miss > receiving many, many > > signals if the band is at all crowded if > you tune using this technique. > > > > Newer radios > generally all allow use of the narrow crystal and > > mechanical > filters in the digital modes and typically have a special > > > "DIGI" mode setting for this purpose. For radios of this type, > it is > > *very important* to tune the station that you are working > to the center > > frequency rather than simply moving the > "marker" on the waterfall and > > not touching the VFO. > The reason is that otherwise you cannot use the > > crystal and > mechanical filters of your rig effectively. The optimal way > > to > tune a station with a modern rig is to place the received signal in > > the center frequency passband, typically either 1000hz (most Yaesu > > > radios, for example) or 1500 hz, and then utilize the rig's > narrow > > filter. For PSK31, literally the narrower the better -- > for example, my > > Mark V's 250hz filters are super for PSK modes, > and the 500hz filters > > are great for MFSK, 500hz Olivia, Domino, > and MT63. Doing this also > > makes the IF width and shift controls > much more effective, and often you > > can use these controls to > eliminate even a QRMing signal that is inside > > the narrow > passband "corridor." > > > > Placing the received > signal in the center frequency passband often makes > > a huge > difference in your ability to receive a signal. Often if there > > > is a strong PSK signal elsewhere on the band, it will desensitze your > > receiver through AGC action to the point where you are not > receiving the > > weaker signals at all. Kick in the narrow > filters, and this problem > > will disappear. This is true even > with higher-end rigs such as the > > FT1000MP/Mark V. Sure, you can > work stations by simply moving the > > "marker" to the > station you want to work rather than tuning the same > > station to > your rig's center frequency, but this technique is > > sub-optimal > and makes the signal you wish to receive subject to QRM and > > AGC > desensitization even from signals 1Khz or more away. > > > > > You can usually readily see how important 1) tuning the received signal > > > to the center frequency and 2) kicking in the narrow filters > actually > > is, by watching the waterfall. Often the waterfall on > the rig will be > > dark when the passband is wide open, and much > lighter on the received > > signal once the filters are kicked in. > This is because some stronger > > signal outside of the filter > passband is desensitizing the receiver. I > > can often copy > signals with the filters in the circuit that are > > completely > invisible on the waterfall without the filters. > > > > The > best digital programs recognize the importance of tuning the > > > received signal to the center passband frequency, and make this easy to > > > do. DM780 has a center frequency marker, and with one click of > an icon > > it automatically tunes the received signal to the > center passband (moves > > the received signal "marker" > to the "C" center frequency marker). One > > more click > and you can kick in whichever narrow filters your rig has > > that > are appropriate for the mode, e.g. 500hz for MFSK, much narrower > > for PSK. MixW also enables the user to do this with a few clicks by > use > > of an easy-to-program macro function. > > > > > As the band conditions start to improve, with more signals on the band > > (remember, we are presently right at the solar minimum) using the > narrow > > filters on digital modes will become more and more > important. > > > > de Roger, W6VZV > > > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked > Page at > > http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ > > > > > > > ID required) > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > >