I wonder what kind of "investment" is required. It has as many points as possible in common with sound card modes and only requires MultiPSK as terminal program.
If I am not asking for a comparison between apples and oranges (I am not entirely convinced right now... 8-) ), maybe Tony could devise some measurements to compare them. 73, Jose, CO2JA --- Andy obrien wrote: > While I have seen how well ALE 400 works, I am not convinced that it > is worth the effort to invest in activity due to the lack of other > hams using the mode. While ALE400 make sense to me, I can't see hams, > en masse , switching to it. I still think that a better option would > be the increased development of NBEMS PSK and MFSK with ARQ as > implemented in FLDIGI. While perhaps not as robust as ALE 400 FAE , > it is far more likely to be used by hams if there is more publicity > about NBEMS. > > Andy K3UK VI Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación Energética 9 - 12 de Junio 2009, Palacio de las Convenciones ...Por una cultura energética sustentable www.ciercuba.com
