"I think most would interpret"

Only if they are ...well...forget it....

On 8/31/09, Tony <[email protected]> wrote:
> Trip,
>
>>>> Trust me pal... been using ALE400 from the start...the outa-sync issue
>>>> is not just a
>>>> one time thing... and not just on QRP.
>>>> Im a big fan of ALE400 and MultiPSK(reg) ...BUT,,, , It IS a major
>>>> issue.
>>>> When you have had it occur 40-50 times(with 20 over sig.)
>>>> ..then tell me its not major.
>
> I think most would interpret "when you have it occur 40-50 times with 20
> over signal" as the number of out-of-sync collisions that occurred during
> just one of your ALE-400 contacts and not the number of times overall.
>
> Understand if you'd rather not discuss it further. Hope you're able to get
> it working; let us know what you find.
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
>
>
>> ***"If I'm not mistaken, you referred to the sync issue as a major problem
>> that happens 40-to-50 times during a QSO with S-9 plus signals both
>> ways"***
>>
>> 40 to 50 times during a QSO!!..WOW....... Damn..I think If it occured that
>> many times during 1 QSO..I would give up..
>> Dont ya think????
>>
>> Look guys...Its MUST me something I'm doing wrong or my equipment..I
>> mean...I have only been using this mode
>> from the time it came out... and on no less than 3 or 4 diff. radios,
>> bands and puters..
>> With no less than 10-15 other users.
>>
>> I have ONLY been on HF digi for JUST a few days ...Got my ticket from that
>> "Cracker Jack Box"
>> Its me, its not really happining..
>>
>> I mean.. the hundreds of other users surely would have found this
>> problem....Right??
>>
>> Just let it go...I have.
>>
>> End of thread.
>>
>> 73 de Trip - KT4WO
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: Tony
>>  To: [email protected]
>>  Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 3:11 PM
>>  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Trip,
>>
>>  > Its not a unique problem. KT4WO
>>
>>  Well it does seem to be unique problem because we haven't heard from
>> anyone else with major sync issues (yet). Your comments will hopefully,
>> bring them out of the woodwork. In my experience and in the experience of
>> others, ALE-400 sync issues happen occasionally and are almost always
>> associated with weak signals.
>>
>>  As the band fades, the mode dips below it's useful threshold and loses
>> sync. At that point, it's time to quit or switch bands. Trying to continue
>> after that results in a high number of collisions / sync issues because
>> signals are just too weak.
>>
>>  If I'm not mistaken, you referred to the sync issue as a major problem
>> that happens 40-to-50 times during a QSO with S-9 plus signals both ways.
>> That certainly seems like a unique situation, but without knowing the
>> circumstances at the time, it's hard to tell what's really going on.
>>
>>  We would certainly appreciate a more detailed description of the band
>> conditions when the mode lost sync that excessive number of times. For
>> example; was there heavy QSB, QRM, QRN? Does it ever happen on a clear
>> channel?  Does it happen on one band more than others? Does it happen on
>> one PC more than another.
>>
>>  You're welcome to sked with me anytime Trip. I'm always on in the
>> evenings starting around 2300z. I run a 5 element 20 meter mono-band Yagi
>> @ 60ft. I'm sure we could work providing the propagation Gods cooperate.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>
>>  Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  > Its not a unique problem.
>>  > KT4WO
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > On 8/31/09, Tony <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  >> Trip,
>>  >>
>>  >> Sounds like you have a unique problem with ALE-400. Hope you find out
>> what
>>  >> it is and please let us know when you do. Sorry we couldn't help you.
>>  >>
>>  >> Tony -K2MO
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> ----- Original Message -----
>>  >> From: "Thomas Carswell Jr." <[email protected]>
>>  >> To: <[email protected]>
>>  >> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 4:30 PM
>>  >> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>> w4pgh
>>  >>> k3gau
>>  >>> n4wi
>>  >>> wa9hcz
>>  >>> ni9y
>>  >>> n9fdf
>>  >>> k9vu
>>  >>> wb8rol
>>  >>> ai4cm
>>  >>>
>>  >>> Thats just the ones in my log on laptop(im at work)
>>  >>> Most of those I have worked at least 3-5 times, some....alot
>>  >>> more(k3gau,w4pgh)
>>  >>>
>>  >>> No less than 8 diff. soundcards..from onboard to one I spent almost
>>  >>> 100 bucks on...lol
>>  >>>
>>  >>> Again....I love MultiPSK...I almost never run any other
>>  >>> digi-ware...well...FLDigi when I run Puppy.  MultiPSK is the ONLY
>> digi
>>  >>> software I have paid for...and that says alot for me...
>>  >>> Im cheap!!...LOL....
>>  >>>
>>  >>> If it just had a delay kick in when it losses sync...then it could
>>  >>> re-sync.  One gud static crash and it can lose sync.
>>  >>>
>>  >>> Look...Im not trin' to be a prick... but we have tried
>>  >>> everything..."been there, done that" kinda
>>  >>> thing... Me and Bill gave up on it and now use Olivia or
>>  >>> DominoEX....most of the time(75%) it works fine... but that 25% was
>>  >>> just too much...  and I didnt keep records..it may not be 25%..but it
>>  >>> was enuff to frustrate(sp?) us....
>>  >>>
>>  >>> I think if that ONE issue was solved..ALE/FAE400 would be the BEST
>>  >>> error free soundcard mode out there!!
>>  >>>
>>  >>> KT4WO
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>> On 8/30/09, Tony <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  >>>> Thomas,
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>> W4PGH and myself ran this mode 3 to 5 days a week for over 6 months
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>> Just a thought here...
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>> Your station setup sounds ok, but could it be that W4PGH has a VOX
>> delay
>>  >>>> on
>>  >>>> or some other issue? Have you worked anyone else on ALE-400?
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>> Tony -K2MO
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>  >>>> From: "Thomas Carswell Jr." <[email protected]>
>>  >>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>  >>>> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 3:54 PM
>>  >>>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>>I have also used ALE/FAE400 since it was developed ... and no
>> VOX....
>>  >>>>> 2.4 pent 4 with gig of ram...or 1 gig pent3 with 512 ram or 800mhz
>>  >>>>> pent 3 with 512 or 1.5 gig ATOM w/1gig ram.....4 diff. homebrew
>>  >>>>> interfaces some with xformers..some not....Icom IC-718 or Kenwood
>>  >>>>> TS-50 or Kenwood TS450SAT or Kenwood TS-180S....Half-Wave
>>  >>>>> dipoles...160-80-40-30...1/4wave Vert on 30....
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> Over 6,000 digital(HF) QSO's logged in the last 14 years... from
>> the
>>  >>>>> old HAL RTTY interface to the new soundcard modes...
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> Im not a NCPNG that just got on HF/DigiModes last year...LOL... I
>> have
>>  >>>>> been on some type of "digi mode" for the last 18 years.
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> What I see as a "major" problem.. you may not...thats cool... but
>>  >>>>> W4PGH and myself ran this mode 3 to 5 days a week for over 6 months
>> on
>>  >>>>> 80 and 160.....he is 40 miles from me.
>>  >>>>> The sync issue..is just that. Its not my radio, interface, antenna,
>>  >>>>> computer...or me..LOL
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> Its great ya'll are not having the "issue" too offten.  But ...When
>>  >>>>> hams try it out for the first time and it loses sync a few
>>  >>>>> times...they will just switch modes and not look back.
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> KT4WO
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> On 8/30/09, Sholto Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  >>>>>> Trip,
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> You're not by any chance using a VOX interface (like the
>> Signalink)
>>  >>>>>> with
>>  >>>>>> the delay button pressed in are you? That would really screw up
>> the
>>  >>>>>> timing of FAE400.
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> I haven't experienced the collision problem other than when sigs
>> are
>>  >>>>>> really buried in noise.
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> I have also used FAE400 since it was developed and am sure I would
>> have
>>  >>>>>> noticed a major issue like this from the outset.
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> One other thing to consider: What speed of PC are you running it
>> on?
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> 73
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> Sholto
>>  >>>>>> K7TMG
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> Thomas Carswell Jr. wrote:
>>  >>>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>> Trust me pal... been using ALE400 from the start...the outa-sync
>> issue
>>  >>>>>>> is not just a
>>  >>>>>>> one time thing... and not just on QRP.
>>  >>>>>>> Im a big fan of ALE400 and MultiPSK(reg) ...BUT,,, , It IS a
>> major
>>  >>>>>>> issue.
>>  >>>>>>> When you have had it occur 40-50 times(with 20 over sig.)
>>  >>>>>>> ..then tell me its not major.
>>  >>>>>>> I have had 100+ QSO's in this mode....with 10-12 diff. ops.
>>  >>>>>>> BTW..the new "PSK-Packet" has the same problem.
>>  >>>>>>> KT4WO
>>  >>>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>> On 8/30/09, John Bradley <jbrad...@sasktel. net
>>  >>>>>>> <mailto:jbradley%40sasktel.net>> wrote:
>>  >>>>>>>  >
>>  >>>>>>>  >
>>  >>>>>>>  > "> I have brought this up to Patrick a few times....I asked
>> for a
>>  >>>>>>>  >> "slottime" or some random timer...
>>  >>>>>>>  >> I think this would solve the problem. This is a MAJOR ISSUE
>> with
>>  >>>>>>> ALE400.
>>  >>>>>>>  >> Until this is fixed...ALE400 will never become "mainstream"
>>  >>>>>>>  >> I have been fighting this issuse sense ALE400 came out.
>>  >>>>>>>  >> So far...he has not worked on that..maybe you will have
>> better
>>  >>>>>>> luck
>>  >>>>>>>  > getting
>>  >>>>>>>  >> him to address this.??!!??! !??
>>  >>>>>>>  >> Maybe now that someone other than me and Dave "sees" this is
>> a
>>  >>>>>>> problem,
>>  >>>>>>>  >> Patrick
>>  >>>>>>>  >> will fix it???
>>  >>>>>>>  >
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
>>  >>>>>> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> Recommended digital mode software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or
>>  >>>>>> Multipsk
>>  >>>>>> Logging Software:  DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe.
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>>
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>
>>  >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to