I have had a few more days to test it and watch how it does in QRM. Same impressions, a good mode but not offering substantially more than the other well known modes. In a couple of specific tests, Olivia 500-128 did better than ROS 1.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Stelios Bounanos <m0...@enotty.net> wrote: > > > >>>>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:05:36 -0000, "obrienaj" > >>>>> <k3uka...@gmail.com<k3ukandy%40gmail.com>> > said: > > > In the few ROS 16 and ROS 1 tests that I have dome so far... > > > ROS 16 seems similar to Olivia 8/1000 , good performance but perhaps a > > not quite as good as Olivia under QRM or deep fades. > > > ROS 1 , not as good as JT65A in very poor conditions. > > > Anyone else have impressions, perhaps I am wrong... these are on-air > > impressions not lab tests. > > I wonder if there are any test results (or even on-air impressions > substantially different from Andy's) to explain what looks like the > proverbial elephant in the living room from where I'm standing... i.e., > the fact that ROS is > 2000 Hz while Olivia nn/1000 and JT65A are 1000 > and < 200 Hz respectively. > > Or is it now somehow cool to do the same thing as before but with a > 2x-12x larger footprint on the bands? > > -- > > 73, Stelios, M0GLD. > > Reply > to<m0...@enotty.net?subject=re:+%5Bdigitalradio%5D+ROS+impressions+so+far> >
