Does not believe that even you, Andy. I know you are a special interest ROS dont was used, i dont know why.
________________________________ De: Andy obrien <[email protected]> Para: [email protected] Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 00:58 Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS impressions so far I have had a few more days to test it and watch how it does in QRM. Same impressions, a good mode but not offering substantially more than the other well known modes. In a couple of specific tests, Olivia 500-128 did better than ROS 1. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Stelios Bounanos <m0...@enotty. net> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:05:36 -0000, "obrienaj" <k3uka...@gmail. com> >>>>>> said: > >> In the few ROS 16 and ROS 1 tests that I have dome so far... > >> ROS 16 seems similar to Olivia 8/1000 , good performance but perhaps a >> not quite as good as Olivia under QRM or deep fades. > >> ROS 1 , not as good as JT65A in very poor conditions. > >> Anyone else have impressions, perhaps I am wrong... these are on-air >> impressions not lab tests. > >I wonder if there are any test results (or even on-air impressions >substantially different from Andy's) to explain what looks like the >proverbial elephant in the living room from where I'm standing... i.e., >the fact that ROS is > 2000 Hz while Olivia nn/1000 and JT65A are 1000 >and < 200 Hz respectively. > >Or is it now somehow cool to do the same thing as before but with a >2x-12x larger footprint on the bands? > >-- > >73, Stelios, M0GLD. > >Reply to >
