I dont create ROS 1 baud only for EME operation. ROS 1 baud is also for QRP 
enthusiasts in HF. I think these people have the same right to experiment with 
weak signals in HF, and we should select some channel for this propose.  

But obviusly, should have more channels to 16 bauds than 1 baud.



________________________________
De: KH6TY <kh...@comcast.net>
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: mar,2 marzo, 2010 01:42
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Spectrum is for ALL users

  
Sorry Dave, I don't follow you as to what would be "stupid".

The point is that any suggested frequency exclusive to 1 baud suggests to 16 
baud users to stay off. However, there are many more 16 baud users than 1 baud 
if you monitor both frequencies, and QSO's move much faster, allowing for more 
users to use the space. Suggesting 1 baud primarily for VHF/UHF, where it is 
more effective, would provide more suggested space for 16 baud users on HF and 
relieve congestion.

20m is only one example, of course, and the same principle could be applied to 
other bands. 

Perhaps I misunderstood you.

73 - Skip KH6TY



Dave Ackrill wrote: 
  
>KH6TY wrote:
>> I agree that is easier. The problem is that 14109 has been designated as 
>> 1 baud exclusive, so that is not suggested as available to go to. Even 
>> though is an advantage to being about to work at -35 dB S/N, the 
>> advantage is much greater at VHF and UHF, where atmospheric noise is a 
>> greater problem than on HF. So, if 14109 is not suggested as exclusive 
>> to 1 baud, there will be more space for HF users of ROS to go to avoid 
>> QRM or ROS interference - practically, on 20m, twice as much space.
>
>Exclusive only on 20M, not *all bands*, that would be stupid...
>
>Dave (G0DJA)
>



      

Reply via email to