Quoting Ville Syrj?l? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Here's a patch to support the second head of Matrox cards. There is one
> outstanding problem: the BES. Maybe dfb_gfxcard_get_accelerator() should
> return some private value for CRTC2 and the BES layer could be disabled?
> Dualhead operation isn't exactly possible. With the single application
> core it draws to both heads but takes turns in doing so, and with the
> multi application core it waits for one application to finish before the
> other one starts. Actullay when I tested with the multi application core I
> had my AGP patch applied as well so it might do something different
> without it.

Thanks, I will apply the patch. It's a nice workaround for the dual head
framebuffer device problem. I'm very unhappy about the current solution
of the matroxfb driver. I don't want to divide my 32mb fixed into 16mb and
8mb (why 8?). The best would be to have multi head support in DirectFB and
open and map both devices, but it would require a lot of work.

Btw, Mike, how is the TV color adjustments going for the G450/G550?
I have to decrease colors a lot and increase contrast a lot on my TV set
to get a reasonable output.

-- 
Best regards,
  Denis Oliver Kropp

.------------------------------------------.
| DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
| http://www.directfb.org/                 |
"------------------------------------------"

                            Convergence GmbH


-- 
Info:  To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
"unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.

Reply via email to