On 5/9/05, attilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Emmel ha scritto: > > Hmm the current CVS is running agianst the gnome CVS its not tied to a > > version number. > > So its in development mode. There is no gdkdirectfb backend for the 2.6 > > series. > > I'm working on it now and there are a number of bugs mainly related to > > Cairo support which itself is in flux. My plan was to get everything > > working soon after the 2.8 gtk release which is sometime this summer. > > > > My suggestion would be to use the X11 version and try to work with the > > current 2.8 gtk cvs and flip later. I am at least successful and > > moving between backends x11/gdk as I check for bugs and there are a > > few. I'm guessing that the gdk backend won't be stable for at least a > > few months and even then probably not widely usable till after gtk 2.8 > > ships because gtk itself is in major flux right now. > > Ok, then we'll continue developing and testing in X; by the way i'll do > some gtk 2.8 tests > > > Now you can back down the gtk version I think 2.02 or something thats > > the last stable port. > > I'll try to build the latest gdk-dfb against that version of gtk > No thats not what I meant see below. Right now it builds agianst whatever version I checkout last. Which was about a month ago. Cairo is close to stabilzing some let me mail the gtk-dev list and see if there going to tag the repository soon. I was waiting to upgrade the build till I got at least a semi stable tag form gtk/cairo. I saw you posted on the gtk-dev list see what they say.
> > Or you could consider the last version of gtk that worked with the > > interal frambuffer support if only single application support for the > > ui is okay. ( It did not compile for me and I'm not sure its > > maintained) > > fb-gdk does not compile on gtk+, so i think dfb, even if still buggy, is > still better. Yes. > > > With all that said I do have binaries if you really really want them :) > > I'll try to build a gtk 2.0.x with the latest gdk; anyway i would be > very grateful to you if you could setup some precomipled gtkdfb > precompiled libraries. > This because the gtk-dfb environment can be easily integrated in the > debian-installer cd, while the X one give more difficulties; having the > opportunity to test the frontend "on the road" and not just on the test > bench would be very very useful. First before you get on the wrong path I mean you should use .. http://www.directfb.org/downloads/Libs/gtk+-directfb-2.0.9-2.tar.gz As far as binairies go can some of the directfb maintainer respond ? I'm actually working on a morphix cd distro so maybe we can just collaborate on this some. Its morphix with directfb/gtk etc .. I think that simply doing a directfb morphix goodies cd would be the best answer. It meets your needs and also is useful to a wide variety of people. > > thank you very much > > ciao > > Attilio > > _______________________________________________ > directfb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev > _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
