On 1/4/06, Kent Sandvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/4/06, Mike Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/4/06, Alex Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hohoho > > > The gtk-web core 0.5 release is more like a cvs versoin :) > > > Lot of compile error :) > > > > > > > > Yes you have to use the one in cvs and then I had to patch that a little > > bit. > > Oh, you are using the old Nokia gtk port. I would think that's very > much out of sync with the latest CVS version over at > webkit.opendarwin.org. Then again that version, unless I'm wrong, does > not have the right automake structure in place for Linux builds.--Kent >
Right on both counts. But the main difference between the two is not at the port level but the higher code thats not changed by the gtk port. Yes it needs and upgrade and now that I've started the project thats on my todo list. Although the porting api is not clean the code is well split into platform dependent and platform independent code. So I don't see keeping in sync with the main platform to be a big issue. I think once the pure gtk port works and is upgraded it may be worth investigating moving it over to darwin they have a blurp about a desire to bring the gtk port into the main branch. In the short term getting the port up to date and working on Directfb can be done in the directfb cvs. This is the approach I took with cairo and gtk. I have finally gotten feedback from the gtk folks about the directfb backend. Mike _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
