Look like if we just replace the nrcit GdkXftContext and XftTextRenderer and XftTextRendererFactory should be easy? :)
Mike Emmel wrote: > On 1/4/06, Kent Sandvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 1/4/06, Mike Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 1/4/06, Alex Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> hohoho >>>> The gtk-web core 0.5 release is more like a cvs versoin :) >>>> Lot of compile error :) >>>> >>>> >>> Yes you have to use the one in cvs and then I had to patch that a little >>> bit. >> Oh, you are using the old Nokia gtk port. I would think that's very >> much out of sync with the latest CVS version over at >> webkit.opendarwin.org. Then again that version, unless I'm wrong, does >> not have the right automake structure in place for Linux builds.--Kent >> > > Right on both counts. > > But the main difference between the two is not at the port level but > the higher code thats not changed by the gtk port. Yes it needs and > upgrade and now that I've started the project thats on my todo list. > Although the porting api is not clean the code is well split into > platform dependent and platform independent code. So I don't see > keeping in sync with the main platform to be a big issue. I think > once the pure gtk port works and is upgraded it may be worth > investigating moving it over to darwin they have a blurp about a > desire to bring the gtk port into the main branch. > > In the short term getting the port up to date and working on Directfb > can be done in the directfb cvs. This is the approach I took with > cairo and gtk. I have finally gotten feedback from the gtk folks about > the directfb backend. > > Mike > _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
