Mike Emmel wrote:
> On 1/6/06, Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Mike Emmel wrote:
>>
>>>I'm not sure about this
>>>- if (id >= DIKI_0 && id <= DIKI_9 )
>>>+ if (id >= DIKI_0 && id <= DIKI_9 && !shift ){
>>> return DIKS_0 + id - DIKI_0;
>>>+ } else {
>>>+ switch(id) {
>>>+ case DIKI_1: return DIKS_EXCLAMATION_MARK;
>>>+ case DIKI_2: return DIKS_AT;
>>>+ case DIKI_3: return DIKS_NUMBER_SIGN;
>>>+ case DIKI_4: return DIKS_DOLLAR_SIGN;
>>>+ case DIKI_5: return DIKS_PERCENT_SIGN;
>>>+ case DIKI_6: return DIKS_CIRCUMFLEX_ACCENT;
>>>+ case DIKI_7: return DIKS_AMPERSAND;
>>>+ case DIKI_8: return DIKS_ASTERISK;
>>>+ case DIKI_9: return DIKS_PARENTHESIS_LEFT;
>>>+ case DIKI_0: return DIKS_PARENTHESIS_RIGHT;
>>>+ default:;
>>>+ }
>>>+ }
>>>
>>>I had code like this before and it broke things.
>>>I don't think you want to set the key_id to a DIKS.
>>>Can someone comment on this please.
>>>Denis ???
>>
>>This is a part of the id_to_symbol() function, so it's correct
>>to return DIKS_* here, but I'm wondering why DIKI_1 translates to
>>an exclamation mark and not to DIKS_1 :)
>>
>
>
> That code runs if the shift key is down.
Hmm, I would have done a cascaded if to save the switch.
--
Best regards,
Denis Oliver Kropp
.------------------------------------------.
| DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
| http://www.directfb.org/ |
"------------------------------------------"
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
