hehe :) it is actually shifted!
Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
> Mike Emmel wrote:
>> I'm not sure about this
>> - if (id >= DIKI_0 && id <= DIKI_9 )
>> + if (id >= DIKI_0 && id <= DIKI_9 && !shift ){
>> return DIKS_0 + id - DIKI_0;
>> + } else {
>> + switch(id) {
>> + case DIKI_1: return DIKS_EXCLAMATION_MARK;
>> + case DIKI_2: return DIKS_AT;
>> + case DIKI_3: return DIKS_NUMBER_SIGN;
>> + case DIKI_4: return DIKS_DOLLAR_SIGN;
>> + case DIKI_5: return DIKS_PERCENT_SIGN;
>> + case DIKI_6: return DIKS_CIRCUMFLEX_ACCENT;
>> + case DIKI_7: return DIKS_AMPERSAND;
>> + case DIKI_8: return DIKS_ASTERISK;
>> + case DIKI_9: return DIKS_PARENTHESIS_LEFT;
>> + case DIKI_0: return DIKS_PARENTHESIS_RIGHT;
>> + default:;
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> I had code like this before and it broke things.
>> I don't think you want to set the key_id to a DIKS.
>> Can someone comment on this please.
>> Denis ???
>
> This is a part of the id_to_symbol() function, so it's correct
> to return DIKS_* here, but I'm wondering why DIKI_1 translates to
> an exclamation mark and not to DIKS_1 :)
>
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
