On Dienstag 09 Mai 2006 06:45, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:33:31AM +0100, Laz wrote:
> > On Monday 08 May 2006 22:43, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > {snip}
> > > I still think the automatic field handling might be good since I can't
> > > imagine anyone expecting to see separated fields on their interleaved
> > > display :) However I could live with a new blitting flag for field
> > > blitting. Field swapping I think should be automatic because otherwise
> > > odd coordinates would need rounding and if we allow both modes of
> > > operation the code would probably get even more complicated.
> >
> > As an aside, how easy would it be to add a flag which sent only one of the
> > fields (twice) to an interlaced display? This would allow the flicker to be
> > removed when an interleaved stream is paused!
>
> That would need a new blitting flag. Rather than a 'duplicate field'
> flag I think a 'blit just one field' flag could be mor useful.
>
I though that is just DSBLIT_DEINTERLACE.
--
Stefan Lucke
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
