On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> On Dienstag 09 Mai 2006 06:45, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:33:31AM +0100, Laz wrote:
> > > On Monday 08 May 2006 22:43, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > {snip}
> > > > I still think the automatic field handling might be good since I can't
> > > > imagine anyone expecting to see separated fields on their interleaved
> > > > display :) However I could live with a new blitting flag for field
> > > > blitting. Field swapping I think should be automatic because otherwise
> > > > odd coordinates would need rounding and if we allow both modes of
> > > > operation the code would probably get even more complicated.
> > >
> > > As an aside, how easy would it be to add a flag which sent only one of
> > > the
> > > fields (twice) to an interlaced display? This would allow the flicker to
> > > be
> > > removed when an interleaved stream is paused!
> >
> > That would need a new blitting flag. Rather than a 'duplicate field'
> > flag I think a 'blit just one field' flag could be mor useful.
> >
>
> I though that is just DSBLIT_DEINTERLACE.
DSBLIT_DEINTERLACE stretches one field and treats the destination as
progressive. 'Blit one field' would only touch one field of the
destination. But yes DSBLIT_DEINTERLACE would probably be ok for the
original idea of displaying only one field when paused.
--
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
