Denis Oliver Kropp via CVS wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/directfb
> Module name: DirectFB
> Changes by: dok 20061029 11:48:35
>
> Modified files:
> lib/direct : Makefile.am dtest.c memcpy.c
> src/gfx/generic: generic.c
> Removed files:
> lib/direct : cpu_accel.c cpu_accel.h
>
> Log message:
> Removed GPL code, mainly optimized x86 memcpy routines. libc seems fastest
> now anyways.
>
It doesn't seem faster to me!
Which version of libc are you using?
And, most important thing, why should we rely on libc to have x86
optimized memcpy()? What does it happen if someone wants to build using
uClibc?
--
Regards,
Claudio Ciccani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://directfb.org
http://sf.net/projects/php-directfb
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
