Claudio Ciccani schrieb: > Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: >> Mike Emmel schrieb: >>> Denis would you consider a switch to svn or better git ? >>> >>> It makes it a lot easier to do experimental branches. >> svn alone wouldn't be worth a switch, it's the same as cvs. >> >> I haven't looked at git in more detail, but it looked promising so far. >> > > According to my experience with projects using GIT, I can say it's a bit > prohibitive for developers without a large bandwidth! > Indeed, when you clone (checkout) a repository, it starts downloading > all the project's history. For a project started more than a year ago, > that means HUNDREDS of Mega Bytes! > hi,
from all my scm experiences i would prefer svn to replace cvs. it is a kind of cvs compatible but works out a lot smoother. git, mecurial and stuff like that is having a much more complex behaviour. the - as claudio said - only real advantage of those 2 scm's is, testing your bandwith and produce a lot of traffic on the server side also. my 2ct best regards marcel _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
