On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Ulrich von Zadow wrote: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > Things are a bit different if you release all DirectFB interfaces like > > in your example. I think we could change the code so that it accepts > > a reconfiguration by means of DirectFBInit() if used this way. I > > wonder however why you might want to this. Perhaps you can give us a > > usage example? > > I agree what I'm doing sounds strange. > > In my case, these multiple init calls are automated tests, and > obviously, I'd like to make sure that my code works with differing > configurations. > > I can also imagine other situations: A video editor that uses DFB to > render the videos would probably want the ability to show windowed as > well as fullscreen previews too, for instance.
That doesn't require messing the options. IDirectFB::SetCooperativeLevel() handles that case for simple one window apps. Anything more complicated will probably need to use the display layer and window APIs. -- Ville Syrj�l� [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.
