2005/10/27, Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoting Gildas Bayard: > > I'm not sure I understood the relationship between DirectFBGL and Mesa. > > Am I correct if I say: > > - classic Linux openGL program uses Mesa which uses X which uses DRI > > for hardware acceleration > > - DirectFBGL wants openGL hardware acceleration without X, so > > DirectFBGL uses Mesa-embedded which is a modified version a Mesa which > > uses DirectFB instead of X > > But is Mesa-embedded using DRI? > > DirectFBGL uses Mesa-embedded which uses DRI. > > Mesa-embedded is neither DirectFB specific nor using it. But I don't understand: doesn't mesa need to draw stuff using some kind of widgets DirectFB provides? I though DirectFB was a equivalent to Xlib (and much more as it seems) How are Mesa calculation displayed then?
Does this mean that since mesa-embedded only support Matrox (and I have an intel integrated chipset) I could use the standard Mesa with DirectFBGL instead? Gildas> > -- > Best regards, > Denis Oliver Kropp > > .------------------------------------------. > | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | > | http://www.directfb.org/ | > "------------------------------------------" > _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
