On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 02:47:25AM -0500, Ray Schulz wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I was looking at the README for DirectFBGL. The Mesa tarball that it says to
> download is 2 years old,

It's old because Mesa 5.x is old.

> and the README seems to mention only mga, is that
> for Matrox cards?

Yes.

> I'm getting a g450 soon, but currently I got a Mach64, is
> it worth building a 2 year old version of Mesa for an unsupported card or am
> I missing something here?

Only mga is supported.

> Also, looking at the Mesa site, the have a
> fbdev/DRI and also a glFBDev, perhaps those would work on directfb?

No. Both Mesa 6.x and DirectFBGL would require changes to make things 
work. Nobody has had the time/interest to make them.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/

_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users

Reply via email to