Nicolas Huillard wrote: > (I cc. the DirectFB ML, as it could interest people there. We're talking > about a newer viafb driver found at > http://davesdomain.org.uk/viafb/index.php)
Just to explain for anyone following this on the list, I'm writing another viafb. The reason that I started a new one rather than contribute to the one in DirectFB CVS is because the last time I looked there I only found a very old version that appeared to have been abandoned. Because I don't follow DirectFB development very closely, I didn't know about the recent improvements that have been made there until Nicolas contacted me yesterday. > I think the amount of work to update the new driver in DirectFB's CVS is > not that much. Maintenance will imply copying code from VIA's driver, > from time to time. Improving TV tables can be easier if they had the > same format as their counterpart in the openchrome X driver (not that > difficult, either). In which case I'm not sure how I can help, as: * The DirectFB version already does everything mine does and more. * I have not looked at TV output yet (I'm still getting the basics right) so I can't really help with improving the code on this one (at the moment anyway). _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
