Hi, On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 13:38 +0800, 孙宗君 wrote:
> Even though subversion can use http to get and send data. I think it > is a better idea to put a snapshot of GTK+ for directfb on some HTTP > servers since HTTP is the most popular protocol to surge on the > internet. Some HTTP proxy don't support the WEBDEV methods and > directfb community has put its GTK+ for directfb on its website before > as I have seen. I don't know why they don't do like that now. The > latest GTK+ package for directfb on its website is 2.0.9. It's too old > to use now. Well, I used to create these packages. Thus I know best how much work it is. At that point in time I got paid for helping out with DirectFB and the GTK+ port. I fully understand that no one wants to do this without getting paid for it. Especially since there is so little benefit. For most people SVN works fine. And nowadays the official GTK+ release tarballs include the DirectFB port. So there is even less reason to put additional snapshots online. According to the GTK+ 2.10.8 release notes, the build problem with the DirectFB backend has been fixed. And there's even a 2.10.9 release out now. Why don't you just use one of those? Sven _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
