Ok, after some rest to take my breath back (:P) I would like to point out to you one checkstyle rule I totally disagree with:
https://analysis.apache.org/drilldown/violations/76460?priority=MAJOR&rule=checkstyle%3Acom.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.design.VisibilityModifierCheck# My life as a java developer has been considerably better since I quit writing getters and setters . I'd better cut my left hand (well, kinda...) than going back writing get/setters - but I'll stick with anything the team thinks is better. Change the rule or change the code? Ciao, R On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm speechless :O > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> you mean the link in this page >> http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/project-reports.html >> >> :-) >> >> 2011/10/13 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>: >> > I definitely do :) >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Raffaele, >> >> are you talking about this service >> >> >> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-ognl >> >> >> >> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara >> >> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 >> >> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara >> >> >> >> Maurizio Cucchiara >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend : http://talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > >
