I have a proposal to avoid writing accessor methods but having them at the same time: why not plugging ProjectLombok[1]? :) Is not required as dependency at runtime, I would take in consideration... Simo
[1] http://projectlombok.org/ http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, after some rest to take my breath back (:P) I would like to point out to > you one checkstyle rule I totally disagree with: > > https://analysis.apache.org/drilldown/violations/76460?priority=MAJOR&rule=checkstyle%3Acom.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.design.VisibilityModifierCheck# > > My life as a java developer has been considerably better since I quit > writing getters and setters . I'd better cut my left hand (well, kinda...) > than going back writing get/setters - but I'll stick with anything the team > thinks is better. > > Change the rule or change the code? > > Ciao, > R > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm speechless :O >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> you mean the link in this page >>> http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/project-reports.html >>> >>> :-) >>> >>> 2011/10/13 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>: >>> > I definitely do :) >>> > >>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara >>> > <[email protected]>wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi Raffaele, >>> >> are you talking about this service >>> >> >>> http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-ognl >>> >> >>> >> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara >>> >> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 >>> >> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara >>> >> >>> >> Maurizio Cucchiara >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Olivier Lamy >>> Talend : http://talend.com >>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>> >> >> >
