Well, being used to the github workflow this feels quite natural. The un-natural thing is asking before doing it (just fork, branch and make a pull request when you are done). In any case I think jira should be used to track bugs, ask for features and "assign" items, not to obtain an authorization to work on things. It shouldn't prevent spontaneous coding from committers.
Ciao, R Il giorno 26/nov/2011 07:55, "Tommaso Teofili" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Hi all, > > yesterday I was doing some code review on DM and my feeling is that we > should do some refactoring on a couple of things: > - dependencies: I'd like to keep the dependency list size as low as > possible, trying to remove the dependencies that are not "critical" (i.e.: > I wouldn't rewrite a new logger slf4j just works nicely) > - modularity: I think it'd be good if we could enhance cohesion and > modularity of classes; i.e. Cache and CacheService as they have lots of > different methods (different contracts / responsibilities) > > I know those are a kind of high level topics but I think I could try to > create a DM branch where I "propose" some dependencies to be removed and > also some code refactoring. > I'm proposing that instead of opening tinier issues/tasks on Jira since I > think changes would impact lots of classes so it may be hard to maintain. > What do you think? > Tommaso >
