cbalint13 commented on PR #19830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/19830#issuecomment-4742308026
> Thanks @cbalint13 ! i feel this direction starts to increase the
complexity as we bring in more variants. One original motivation of the server
is that some env may not have python env, while tracker we do not have the
concern. Having a single implementation helps the abilty to maintain while
reduces overall complexity of project. So personally i think such
implementation would be better stay off tree.
It is ok, I leave in Draft (closed) here, so if any user find useful can
pick it up.
My thought was:
* single standalone tool that can handle this ttracking part too
```tvm_rpc```
* tracker can run in python-less enviroments just like ```tvm_rpc```
* tracker calls api still available via ffi, tuner may lunch the tracker
too for itself (why not)
* if good enough, in time can phase out the python counter part
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
