tqchen commented on PR #19750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/19750#issuecomment-4753523201

   are we sure we want to have this behavior? The report is likely mostly come 
from fuzzer, and while Nan preserving is nice, having an explicit nan where 
check here will likely slow down the computation, i would rather have us to 
have less strict behavior while being efficient while leaving Nan handling as 
undefined behavior


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to