On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:26:57AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:40, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote: > > You'd need to buffer enough samples to get your delay. ie you don't care > about > time as such, just think of it in samples :) >
You'd be depending on unspecified and HIGHLY subject-to-change implementation details. If you are counting on a delay and a parallel filter to stay in phase, they need to be implemented in the same C++ block. We don't make any guarantees about the amount of buffering between blocks and whether it stays constant over time. Is this a scary enough disclaimer? Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
