On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Michael Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gr-ucla requires gnuradio-core, and hence is not a separate program by GPL's > definition.
Doesn't this become a GNU Radio license issue then - not really a gr-ucla license issue? Source can be built without linking the object code with GNU Radio - it's a standalone piece. That being said, it won't do anything interesting - but it is standalone. Once you link against GNU Radio, then it becomes a GNU Radio licensing issue - but that shouldn't stop the author of the original source to have to worry about said licensing issues. Putting CGRAN projects into the GR trunk is the main issue, right? It would seem the only way to do this would be to have a GPL v3 compatible license associated with the project. So, it seems, for any hope of being incorporated into the main GR trunk, GPL v3 compatible must be used - otherwise, it can be whatever license the author decides as long as it does NOT include files COPIED from the GNU Radio, and only links against the libraries. Does that make sense? Brian _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
