On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:15:41PM -0400, Brian Padalino wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Michael Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > gr-ucla requires gnuradio-core, and hence is not a separate program by GPL's > > definition. > > Doesn't this become a GNU Radio license issue then - not really a > gr-ucla license issue?
It basically boils down to GPLv3 compliance. > Source can be built without linking the object code with GNU Radio - > it's a standalone piece. That being said, it won't do anything > interesting - but it is standalone. Once you link against GNU Radio, > then it becomes a GNU Radio licensing issue - but that shouldn't stop > the author of the original source to have to worry about said > licensing issues. See my prior post in response to George with references to the GPLv3 and the compliance guide from the SFLC. Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
