On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Michael Dickens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 9, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Alexandru Csete <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for the detailed instructions. >> >> I didn't have macports installed so I started from scratch. I installed >> macports, then boost 1.51 according to your instructions. Then I try to >> install uhd before gnuradio: >> >> sudo ports install uhd +libusb >> >> and that installs boost 1.52 :( >> >> If you have any advice for what I should do before continuing with gnuradio, >> please let me know. > > Hi Alexandru - You're welcome! I'm glad to hear from OSX GNU Radio users. > > Chances are that boost 1.51 is still installed, but not active in MacPorts. > You can view all of the installed boost ports via: > > port installed boost > > to verify that it's still around. If not, try re-doing my instructions for > installing boost 1.51. If it is around, you can try this to make sure boost > 1.51 is the active boost: > > gg=`port installed boost | grep 51 | sed -e "s@(active)@@g"` > sudo port activate $gg > > If Boost 1.51 is already active, the above will do nothing. If it is not > active, it should be made so, an boost 1.52 deactivated (first). Both GNU > Radio and UHD work with Boost 1.51, so all you should have to do is > (re)activate the older Boost. > > You can verify which version of Boost is active via: > > port installed boost | grep active
Hi Mike, Thanks for your help. As it turns out, I simply forgot to run the last step that actually installs boost 1.51 after building it - that explains why boost 1.52 got installed with uhd. I have now rebuilt 1.51, deactivated 1.52 and installed 1.51. Everything is ok now and I installed gnuradio without problems. I used: "sudo port install gnuradio +orc +uhd" During configuration I saw the message: WARNING: GNU Radio's VOLK component (which handles vector optimized instructions and routines) compiles best when using GCC. The selected compiler is CLANG, which will result in a fully functioning GNU Radio install but the VOLK component will not utilize the CPU's capabilities. Do you have any experience whether this can be a real performance issue and what I can do to use gcc instead of clang? Alex _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
