Hi Marcus, > Use digipots to set the R values, and use a fixed value for C, or perhaps selectable C as well (probably only two or three values).
friends of mine tried to do variable attenuation for powerline communication frontends using digipots, and: these can be very frequency-selective, even below 10 MHz. Maybe they were just using the wrong components. > Or, a small number (4?) of selectable L-C-R low-pass filters, and fix the > sample rates to a small number. That sounds like a nice choice, given the existence of highspeed analog switches (which have gotten really affordable due to USB2, PCIe and USB3). I wonder if one could build an active filter with a (video?) opamp and make components in the feedback branches exchangeable, assuming the contribution of the analog switch compared to the effective component values at the frequencies of interest are negligible. Then again, this pretty much sounds like a non-integrated digipot, doesn't it? Best regards, Marcus
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
