MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any or all of the above may be my fault and I'll try to rebuild > some things properly (following instructions carefully, taking > logs and all that) later today to test, but I'd welcome hearing > about advances since November on any of the above.
Further to the above: I tried, but the current back-art release doesn't compile with the current freetype. Reported as bug 12009. Looks like it might be fixed in CVS, but I guess it can't be enough to affect release dates. After all, freetype 2.1.8 had been out for about 5 months already when back 0.9.4 was released. So, I wonder how many non-CVS users use back-art? Is it premature to talk about switching defaults? -- MJR/slef _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
