Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure what you're implying here, but I believe that Alex Malmberg has a > patch for the problem. :)
I imply nothing more than I wrote: the latest back-art release never worked with the contemporary release of freetype. > Additionally, users CAN download the previous version of freetype and use that > if they have a newer installation of Linux. So, you think users should install year-old freetype on their systems, with poorer hinting and flakier Type 1 font handling? Alternatively, "track CVS". Or install back-xlib, which has a working released version. I know which I think is easier for users and better advice. [...] > > Is it premature to talk about switching defaults? > No. It's precisely the right time to do so. Art is simply a more advanced > backend and doesn't suffer from the same issues as xlib. Are any of the back-xlib issues actually design problems or could more love fix them all? -- MJR/slef _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
