-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So, I've read the thread here:
On 2005-10-12 14:16:25 -0400 Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnustep/2004-01/msg00642.html
Is it safe to assume that that proposal, with the comments that clarified it, are what's being implemented? If I have patches that better implement this proposal, or fix bugs, etceteras, will they be welcomed? I ask, because the discussion seemed to go: - - proposal - - suggestions - - RANT RANT RANT ... and I wouldn't want to "break" something that someone else expects/uses, but then again, it'd be nice to be able to say what is correct, and what isn't. Thanks for the link ... looks like it was posted just before I really started using GNUstep. :-) __Armando Di Cianno -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail iD8DBQFDTVvmwgiTPLI9xhcRAlFxAJ9WahrUcHABmxS4JRhe9q1M4cMfDACggoJJ PT5EuvrGqZlS6uHBoFOpZxI= =QQ4d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
