Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding voting, maybe you could explain why you think it's a bad idea?
Voting is only one form of "democracy". It is pushed when the majority cannot or doesn't want to address concerns of minorities. This is often called "tyranny of the majority" or "dictatorship of the majority" if anyone wants to look it up instead of just taking offence. If anyone is offended by the name, perhaps they should rethink their actions! Voting in a winner-takes-all way is also known as a division, for good reason. There seems very little reason to divide the GNUstep community by moving from one inadequate version control system to another, yet that is being pushed very hard by some. There are times when "there can be only one". This isn't one of them. Reject the idea that "some kind of voting needs to take place" to decide this matter. -- MJR/slef _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
