On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:56:30PM -0500, Andrew Ruder wrote: > I am proposing that GNUstep migrate to using subversion (instead of > CVS). Gna.org (FSF France) has subversion hosting, and I believe Alex > Perez has already registered a GNUstep project there.
Ok, the current summary: * Mixed reactions (as if it wouldn't be). There are several people behind the move and several who oppose it. * Waiting on sourceware.org to reply, I am told they are still considering it. I am told they would much more rather us have fully moved over there, but in order to not raise even more of an argument I decided it best not to tack more onto what it would take to move. Hosting just subversion is as of yet still a possibility, I have not heard anything to say otherwise. * Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall negative response. My question: Should the sourceware.org folks respond favorably to our hosting of gnustep subversion there, will it be pursued? I have seen lots of arguments going both ways, but have not noticed anything from the core developers stating whether this thread of action will even be considered. In short, should I just inform the sourceware.org people not to worry about it and just wait for savannah to offer some alternative? Or should I begin some proposals of layout for the new repository and start figuring out the details with the hope that hosting issue solves itself? I'm not looking for a flamefest here, just a simple yes or no from a core developer with some clout in the GNUstep project, or at least some suggestions of things that would be required besides figuring out the hosting issue. Thanks, Andy -- Andrew Ruder http://www.aeruder.net _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
