On 12/16/05, Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > to better support the development of Appkit bundles, wouldn't it make > > sense to 'offer' an additional header directory that includes header > > files found in gnustep-back, and put them in Headers/gnustep/back/ ? > could you please explain what you are trying to achive? What sort of > AppKit bundles are you thinking of and what would these use the backend > headers for?
'Inofficial' backends, that is, those that aren't included in gnustep-back. Right now, if you want to work on a project that does need to override anything in XG*.h you will need to manually copy those files over to your project tree so they can get included. That may make it pretty... incompatbile to other releases. > The different backend currently offer different internal functionality, > by making this differences publicly accessible we would enforce > applications that only work with some backends. Which looks like a bad > thing to me. Yes, I agree. OTOH, then there shouldn't be any Headers/gnustep/... include directory. As I see it, anything 'under' Headers/gnustep/... isn't supposed to be used in a regular / 'normal' project anyway. -- Chris _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
