Fred Kiefer schrieb: > > I can see your point now. But I must state that I never liked these > header files in Headers/GNUstepGUI and Headers/GNUstepBase, which are > the current names for these directories, too much. We need them to make > certain classes available for the next lever of GNUstep modules and some > even to applications. Even now there are a few files in there in the > GNUstepGUI directory, where I don't see much reason, why they are public > (the whole layout stuff, for example).
I agree that we should not expose methods/symbols that should be private. But the point of Headers/GNUstepBase and Headers/GNUstepGUI was to have place to put headers that we do want to expose as GNUstep extensions. If there is ever something the like the "Additions" project for GUI, that's where it's headers should go. I would be in favor of moving those headers/symbols which are only installed due to technical necessity into Headers/GNUstepBase/Private and Headers/GNUstepGUI/Private. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
