Hey,
let's calm down.
On Thursday, February 2, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Jiva DeVoe wrote:
3. Point 7 on the same page is also incorrect. Project Center is
amazingly buggy from both CVS and official releases. There should be
no shame in bugs, but let's not lie and pretend it's functional for
actual work. I for one don't think it is. There DOES appear to be
"Project Manager" which seems a little better, but what's the
difference between the two? And which is official? GNUstep is very
disorganized with it's tools, and the ones in the main tree are
buggy. GORM actually seems to be doing pretty well, but it crashes
regularly when using camaelon (or at least it did a month or so
ago)... so you see, the conflict here? The page both tells the new
users to use this great theme engine, but it also makes our very own
tools crash.
This is nuts. ProjectCenter has some limitations, but it would be an
insult to serg, robert and the many contributors to it to label it as
unusable. I successfully maintain several projects in it. To be more
complete: I only maintain programs in gnustep using PC. PRICE is one of
my largest projects, having > 8000 lines of code, several dozens of
classes, some plain C code, and a dozen of Resources. I wouldn't call
this peanuts! The application I manage on GAP are also all PCbased. And
I follow closely the work I do on ProjectBuilder and it works very
smooth.
Thus, let's not spread FUD.
I think furthermore to remember that there was work done to make
ProjectCenter working on windows, I didn't check that yet though. I need
to recheck out a new svn repository since this damn, stupid change. I
don't even know if I have svn under mingw.
-Riccardo
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
