On 8/30/06, Rogelio Serrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/30/06, Jason Clouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-08-29 17:07:47 -0400 Michael Hanni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just throwing an idea out here: would it be possible to bind directly
> > to KHTML
> > and skip the WebKit framework nightmare? [1]
>
> Somebody did this a few years ago, I think. But it seems a shame not
> to ride on Apple's coattails with WebKit. After all, they have the
> manpower for QA and development, and plenty of web developers check
> that their stuff works in Safari.
>
> I was working on a CoreFoundation implementation, but I hear that
> WebKit is totally abandoning Cocoa, so I'm not sure it makes a
> difference now. :-(
>
> I think Gecko and libwww are poor choices, personally.
>
poor choices but the only available ones. and they can be improved.
Maybe we should try doing both. Like what i was told in an extreme
programming seminar, go ahead and fail.
i would like to try libwww again. but then the complexity of it all
makes me look for a simpler alternative not just to the browser but
the whole www.
i was wondering too if the web interface and the desktop interface was
merged by design. two birds with one stone.
--
things i hate about my linux pc:
1. it takes more than a second to boot up
2. keeps asking about filenames and directories
3. does not remember what i was working on yesterday
4. does not remember all the changes i have ever made
5.cannot figure out necessary settings by itself
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
