On Aug 30, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Michael Thaler wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
True, especially regarding Gecko. However, using libwww WOULD be an
idea for writing a _very_ simple webbrowser. I was thinking about
that, using libwww as a bundle, so it could be easily replaced in
case
WebKit (or something else that's better than libwww) came along.
What is a _very_ simple webbrowser good for? I don't think many
peope are
interested in using such a browser if there are far better
alternatives like
Firefox and Konqueror.
It could be useful in embedded contexts -- e.g., a class
documentation viewer for ProjectCenter, HTML email viewing in
GNUMail, application help, etc..
If libwww is something relatively lean and mean, so much the better.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
