Chris B. Vetter wrote: > On 3/2/07, Camille Bourgoin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In my opinion, a web framewok is absolutely essential. What is the > > Yes. > >> best solution ? Starting a Framework from scratch ? Using a preexistent >> lightweight engine ? > > I honestly do not know what the best solution would be. However, > starting from scratch probably isn't as there already is work to draw > from. > > The beauty of Objective-C is it's expandability. So I guess the best > way would be to write a browser application as a stand-alone (i.e. > WITHOUT a build-in WWW engine) providing just the basics, that is, a > window (with tabs) that holds the documents (i.e. web pages) and the > navigation bar. Everything else is implemented via "plugins." > > That way, you could use an engine based, say, off libwww, while > another group works on porting WebKit, that can then replace the 'old' > engine, when it's done. You could even provide both and let the user > pick his preferred engine through a preference setting. > I like this idea...
I think iterm is structured this way. >> I'm not a programmer (I'm a philosopher and I'm a poor beginner in >> sh/lisp/C/objective-c who learn a lot but can't doing nothing :( >> ), then I don't realize correctly the amount of work of porting a >> Framework like WebKit... Is the project unmanageable ? > > I don't think so, but it will require a LOT of work. >
begin:vcard fn:Rogelio M. Serrano Jr n:M. Serrano Jr;Rogelio org:SMSG Communications Philippines;Technical Department adr:;;;;;;Republic of the Philippines email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Programmer tel;work:6327534145 tel;home:6329527026 tel;cell:639209202267 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
