*shakes-head* *walks-away*
On 3/3/07, Riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, On Friday, March 2, 2007, at 09:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think it is worth to mention SimpleWebKit here - a rough > implementation of > WebView, WebFrame, WebFrameView, WebDataSource etc. - completely > written > in Objective-C without any C++. The reason is that it must cross- > compile > on gcc 2.95.3 for some ARM processors. I think it is a pretty good idea. If done well it should end up in a cleaner implementation than apple's and also more manageable. Of course it will never reach the completeness of WebKit, since even WebKit pales compared to Gecko. But it could end up being more portable, more efficient and what is good even a good option since you say ti is a reimplementation. As I read it, one browser could use one or the other without big effort. It could be used in a light-browser as well as in applications were an embedded HTML/XHTML engine is needed. Of course it should en handling real-world pages decently, but before worrying of that (links does it and even dillo improved a little) it should display correct pages correctly. The rest is added "burden" actually. Would you consider signing FSF and making it LGPL available in gnustep? -Ric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
